Satpal v. Rajiv Singh

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 24/2017 SATPAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Yasir Arafat with Mr.Satish Kumar Verma, Advocates.

versus RAJIV SINGH ..... Respondent Through Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 12.01.2017 Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of order dated 12th July, 2016 passed in W.P.(C) No.2156/2016, whereby respondent-Land Acquisition Collector/ADM South-East was directed to dispose of petitioner's application filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 within six weeks.

Learned counsel for petitioner states that petitioner's application has not been disposed of till date. Issue notice.

Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. She assures and undertakes to this Court that the petitioner's application shall be disposed of within a period of four weeks.

The statement made by learned counsel for the respondent is accepted by this Court and the respondent is held bound by the same. In view thereof, present contempt petition stands disposed of. MANMOHAN, J JANUARY 12, 2017 KA