M/S Shivnath Rai Haranarain (India) Ltd v. Anup Wadhawan & ORS

$~27.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.APP.(C) 14/2019 M/S SHIVNATH RAI HARANARAIN (INDIA) LTD..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate.

versus ANUP WADHAWAN & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Vinod Divaker, CGSC with Ms.Bakshi Vinita, G.P for respondent No. 1/ UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 15.11.2019 C.M. No. 48898/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

CONT.APP.(C) 14/2019 When the decision of the Supreme Court in D.N. Taneja Vs. Bhajan Lal, (1988) 3SCC 26, was brought to the notice of learned counsel for the appellant - which holds that an appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act would be maintainable only when the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 215 imposes punishment on the contemnor and not otherwise, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal to avail such other remedy as may be

available in law.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. VIPIN SANGHI, J SANJEEV NARULA, J NOVEMBER 15, 2019 kd