Mohd Sagir v. Dr. Kumud Bharti

$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 165/2025 MOHD SAGIR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Aditya and Mr. Anjani Kr.

Mishra, Ms. Samishti Soloman and Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocates.

versus DR. KUMUD BHARTI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Standing Counsel for NCT.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

O R D E R

% 03.02.2025 1.

Learned counsel for respondent appears on advance notice and submits that the revised reply with respect to RTI query in question has already been given. A copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner during course of the hearing.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the above, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, the petitioner does not press the present contempt petition.

3.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed. 4.

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 3, 2025/ss The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2025 at 14:39:19