Jai Hind v. State

$~35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 281/2017 JAI HIND ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sachin Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.K.Singhal, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with SI Anuj, Police Station-Okhla Industrial Area

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 27.01.2017 Vide this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks parole for a period of three months in order to enable him to take care of his wife who is in advanced stage of pregnancy and to re-establish social ties. Status report perused. Standing Counsel for GNCTD has no objection if the petitioner is released on parole.

The address of the petitioner has been verified by the State as per the verification report. Further, as per the verification report, the pregnancy of petitioner's wife is stated to be correct.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a period of one month effective from the date of his release: (i) On furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned.

(ii) He is further directed to report to the concerned SHO, Police Station- Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi on every Monday at 11:00 am during this period.

(iii) He is also directed not to contact, threaten or coerce the victim or any of her family members during this period or to indulge in any illegal activities.

(iv) He is also directed to furnish his contact number to the SHO concerned.

(v) He is to surrender before the Superintendent Jail after the expiry of period of parole.

Petitioner be informed through the Superintendent Jail. Copy of the order also be sent to SHO, Police Station- Okhla Industrial Area, Delhi & to the concerned Jail Superintendent for information.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

A copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for the petitioner. I.S.MEHTA, J JANUARY 27, 2017/radhika