Satya Pal Singh v. State

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 283/2017 SATYA PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Proxy Counsel.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 31.03.2017 Petitioner seeks parole on the ground of filing Special Leave Petition. Address of the petitioner has been verified. Jail conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory. It is trite to say that every convict is entitled to avail all the legal remedies as may be available to him upto the highest forum. Address of the petitioner has been verified.

Keeping in mind the totality of circumstances, it is ordered that petitioner be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent. During the parole period, petitioner shall report to the SHO of police station Bhajanpura once a week, that is, on

Mondays at 10:00 am. On completion of parole period, petitioner shall surrender before the Superintendent Jail.

Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for serving it upon the petitioner and for compliance.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MARCH 31, 2017 ga