← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./846/2025

Sree Balaji K v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR

2025-07-18Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna2 pages

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 846/2025 SREE BALAJI K .....Petitioner Through:

Petitioner in person with Counsel.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP with SI KM Banti, PS: Vasant Vihar.

Ms. Sanjana Sharma Sahu, Advocate for R-2 along with Respondent No.2 through VC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 18.07.2025 CRL.M.A. 3942/2025 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 846/2025 3.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ("BNSS") has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0042/2018 under Sections 354A/354D/507 IPC registered at PS: Vasant Vihar and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of Settlement Deed dated 05.09.2024.

4.

Issue Notice.

5.

Learned APP for State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2 appear on advance Notice and accept Notice.

6.

Prosecutrix joins through Video Conferencing (VC) and submits that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:06:40

Petitioner has not been troubling her for the last many years and incident being of the year 2013, the FIR may be quashed. 7.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Petitioner suffers from Bipolar disorder and has been residing in Andhra Pradesh with his mother and is being supported by his brother. He does not do anything and is fully dependent on his brother.

8.

Submissions heard and record perused.

9.

As per the FIR, while Respondent No.2 and Petitioner had joined classes for IAS in Rajender Nagar, Delhi, Petitioner developed one-sided affection for Respondent No.2 and used to stalk and even sent her incessant messages, which were to the dislike of Respondent No.2. She shifted to Mumbai in the year 2015. It is now submitted that for the last many years, there is an absolute quite and no trouble from the side of the Petitioner. 10.

Considering the nature of allegations and in terms of Settlement Deed dated 05.09.2024, FIR No.0042/2018 under Sections 354A/354D/507 IPC registered at PS: Vasant Vihar and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

11.

Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending Application, if any, also stand disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

JULY 18, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2025 at 12:06:40