Faizan Shekh v. State (Govt. Of NCT) Of Delhi

$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 653/2026 FAIZAN SHEKH .....Applicant Through:

Mr. Deepak Parashar, Adv (through VC) versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms.

Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates SI Shaily Jain, PS: Dayalpur with Complainant Mr. Rohit Verma & Mr.Monu Kumar, Advs. (through VC) for Complainant BAIL APPLN. 656/2026 AKHTARI BEGUM .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Deepak Parashar, Adv (through VC) versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms.

Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates SI Shaily Jain, PS: Dayalpur with Complainant Mr. Rohit Verma & Mr.Monu Kumar, Advs. (through VC) for Complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 14.05.2026 1.

At the outset, learned APP for the State, upon instructions from the IO present in Court, submits that both the applicants herein have since The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:29:01

joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required. He further submits that neither of the applicants are the main accused. 2.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned APP, the present applications are allowed and the same are disposed of accordingly. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 14, 2026/So The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:29:01