Siti Networks Limited v. Sri Mamatha Cable Network & ANR.
$-46 to 53, 55 to 59, 62,63, 71 to 79 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 9874/2020 & CM Nos.31504-05/2020 W.P.(C) 9875/2020 & CM Nos.31506-07/2020 W.P.(C) 9881/2020 & CM Nos.31519-20/2020 W.P.(C) 9882/2020 & CM Nos.31521-22/2020 W.P.(C) 9883/2020 & CM Nos.31523-24/2020 W.P.(C) 9884/2020 & CM Nos.31525-26/2020 W.P.(C) 9885/2020 & CM Nos.31527-28/2020 W.P.(C) 9891/2020 & CM Nos.31540-41/2020 W.P.(C) 9893/2020 & CM Nos.31544-45/2020 W.P.(C) 9894/2020 & CM Nos.31546-47/2020 W.P.(C) 9895/2020 & CM Nos.31548-49/2020 W.P.(C) 9897/2020 & CM Nos.31553-54/2020 W.P.(C) 9898/2020 & CM Nos.31555-56/2020 W.P.(C) 9908/2020 & CM Nos.31585-86/2020 W.P.(C) 9909/2020 & CM Nos.31587-88/2020 W.P.(C) 9941/2020 CM Nos.31636-37/2020 W.P.(C) 9943/2020 & CM Nds.31638-39/2020 W.P.(C) 9944/2020 i& CM Nos.31640-41/2020 W.P.(C) 9946/2020 i& CM Nos.31646-47/2020 W.P,(C) 9947/2020 & CM Nos.31648-49/2020 W.P.(C) 9951/2020 & CM Nos.
31651-52/2020 W.P.(C) 9963/2020 & CM Nos,31695-96/2020 W.P.(C) 9964/2020 & CM Nos.31699-31700/2020 W.P.(C) 9969/2020 & CM Nos.31761-62/2020 + (47 (48 (49 (50 (51 (52 (53 (55 (56 (57 (58 (59 (62 (63 (71 (72 (73 (74 (75 (76 (77 (78 (79 V SITI NETWORKS LIMITED Petitioner Through Ms.Ritwika Nanda, Ms. Petal Chandhok, Mr.Saurav Baveja, Mi'.Himanshu Lilani, Advs.
versus WORLD VISION CABLE NETWORK-1 & ANR Respondents SRI MAMATHA cable network & ANR Respondents MATHRUSHREE COMMUNICATION & ANR Respondents By:AMULYA
2-?
AVE MAMA CABLE NETWORK & ANR.
Respondents LOKESH CABLE NETWORK & ANR.
Respondents SARASWATHI CABLE NETWORK & ANR Respondents NBETU CABLE NETWORK & ANR.
Respondents SM SIGANDUR CABLE NETWORK & ANR Respondents SM BASAVESHWARA CABLE NETWORK & ANR.. Respondents SM MAHESH CABLE NETWORK & ANR Respondents SRINIVAS CABLE NETWORK & ANR.
Rrapondents SM JALAKANTESHWARA CABLE NETWORK & DHANUSH CABLE NETWORK Respondente SARASWATmCA^EJTWO^^^^ .A-.
Prabhakaran Khurana, Advs. (m item no.53,57,58,73,76,78).
Mr. Manikya Khanna, Mr. Adi^a Krishna, Advs.,(in item no.51,55,5y).
HoS MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
ORDER
0/^ 07.12.2020 This hearing has been held by video conferencing. , n.
»' I" r""- "
*■ ;
1. - p- - •" "
1.
2.
have not been listed before the learned Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) in spite of being mentioned for urgent listing. 3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these petitions seek urgent interim relief inasmuch as it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent no.l in each of these petitions, in spite of having Interconnection Agreement(s) with the petitioner, is migrating its subscribers to the respondent no.2 without following the Interconnection Regulations. 4.
Keeping in view the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the underlying dispute between the petitioner and the respondents, the learned TDSAT is requested to list these petitions for hearing within a week of the communication of this order. The petitions shall be considered by the learned TDSAT on their own merit. 5.
The petitions are disposed of with the above directions. There shall be no order as to cost.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J DECEMBER 7, 2020/Arya Signature ^lid NAVll^^mWLA