Malhotra Enterprises v. Ericsson India Private Limited

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 86/2024 MALHOTRA ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Gokul J, Mr.

Bharath Kumar and Mr.

Vivek Sharma, Advocates.

versus ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 12.02.2024 1.

Fresh petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking extension of period of arbitral proceedings for six months w.e.f 10.02.2024. It is submitted that the arguments have commenced before the learned Arbitrator. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance Notice and submits that he has no objection to extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

3.

In view of the submissions made, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by another six months w.e.f 10.02.2024 for concluding the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 12, 2024/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16