Satish Kumar Mishra v. Megha Singh

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ARB.P. 34/2013 SATISH KUMAR MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.

Ritu Jain, Advocate.

(M:9910290400) versus MEGHA SINGH ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.

Aditya Dewan, Mr.

Bharat Bhushan, Ms.

Pooja Yadav, Mr.

Himanshu Gilani and Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advocates for Applicant/Respondent.

(M:9650273107 & 8588013470)

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 02.11.2018 REVIEW APPLICATION 408/2018 in ARB.P. 34/2013 The apprehension of the applicant is that the findings in the order dated 25th September, 2018 would affect him in the merits of the arbitration proceedings or other proceedings, which are pending between the parties. It is made clear that as per paragraph 18 of the judgment, all the allegations, objections and claims of the Respondent have been left open. The purpose of the examination of the documents in the said judgment was limited to the determination as to the existence of the arbitration agreement and nothing more.

Review is disposed of with these observations. Any other pending I.As. are not pressed for and the same are disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

NOVEMBER 02, 2018/dk