Nitin @ Mickey And ORS v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1381/2026, CRL.M.A. 5530/2026 NITIN @ MICKEY AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:
Ms. Taruna Devi, Adv. alongwith petitioners in person.
versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate and SI Vibhu Sharma, PS.: Subzi Mandi, Delhi.
Mr. Chaman Lal, Adv. for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 18.02.2026 1.
By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.510/2025 dated 13.10.2025 registered at PS: Subzi Mandi, Delhi under Sections 110/351(2)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 28.01.2026 [Annexure P2] arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.
2.
Issue notice.
3.
Learned APP for the State accepts notice, and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:24:35
4.
Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notices and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Settlement, and states that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.
5.
The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 6.
Since, a settlement has already been arrived at voluntarily between the parties, and the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions thereof, as also since accompanying affidavit(s) of the parties involved have also been filed herewith, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility.
7.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.510/2025 dated 13.10.2025 registered at PS: Subzi Mandi, Delhi under Sections 110/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
8.
Accordingly, the petition alongwith the pending application is disposed of.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 18, 2026/bh The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:24:35