Vikal Tomer v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 922/2025 VIKAL TOMER .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Nagender Kumar Yadav, Advocate with Ms. Madhavi Yadav, Ms. Parul Tyagi, Advocates.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Rajkumar, APP for State.

Respondent no. 2 in person through VC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 21.03.2025 CRL.M.A. 4261/2025 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 922/2025 & CRL.M.A. 4260/2025 3.

By way of present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 24/2023 dated 23.09.2023, registered at Police Station, Janak Puri Metro, Delhi and chargesheet filed under Sections 354A/354D/506/509 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC‟) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

4.

Issue notice. Mr. Rajkumar, the learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

5.

Brief facts of the case are that due to some misunderstanding between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 a complaint was lodged by respondent no. 2 which resulted into the present FIR bearing No. 24/2023 registered at Police Station, Janak Puri Metro, Delhi. The chargesheet was filed before the concerned Trial Court and charges were framed against the petitioner under Sections 354A/354D/506/509 of IPC. Thereafter, with the intervention of well wishers and relatives, both the parties have resolved & settled their all disputes with each other.

6.

The concerned Joint Registrar (Judicial) has already recorded the statements of the parties regarding the agreement entered into, voluntarily between the parties.

7.

Considering the same, the parties are present through videoconferencing and have been identified by their counsels and Investigating Officer concerned.

8.

The complainant who is present through video-conferencing states that she has no objection, if the FIR is quashed. 9.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, I am of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

10.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 24/2023, registered at Police Station Janak Puri Metro, Delhi for the offence punishable under Sections The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

354A/354D/506/509 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 11.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. 12.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 21, 2025/vc Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.