Union Of India v. Tilak Raj Singh

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 245/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Rajeshwar Singh and Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs.

versus TILAK RAJ SINGH ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Adv. with respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 21.05.2019 CM. No. 21373/2019 Present application has been filed by the applicant / respondent with the following prayers:

"In view of facts and circumstances stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:- 1.

Pass an order directing the Appellant to release in favour of the Applicant the amount of Rs.1,35,508/- and Rs.2,52,200/- wrongly deducted as TDS by the Appellant.

AND / OR ALTERNATIVELY 1.

Pass an order directing the Appellant to carry out the corrections in Form 16A in terms of Para 12 (a) & (b) above with respect to both the TDS, so as to facilitate the Applicant to take refund from the Income Tax Authority.

2.

Pass an order directing the Appellant to adequately compensate the Applicant / Respondent for causing

mental and physical harassment to him by their wrongful acts.

3.

Pass an order directing the cost of litigation in favour of the Applicant / Respondent"

Pass any other / further order (s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner / Union of India states, necessary correction with regard to the name in the Form 16A shall be carried out on the respondent approaching the concerned officer being Sr. Manager (Commercial) in the accounts branch. He also states, even though the PAN details are not mentioned in the certificate, respondent can still take the benefit of the TDS certificate issued by the department qua the compensation and the interest thereon. The said statement is taken on record. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of. Dasti.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MAY 21, 2019/jg