Avinash Kumar v. State

$~ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 74/2001 AVINASH KUMAR ...Appellant Through: None.

versus STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

With + CRL.A. 88/2001 KULDEEP SINGH ...Appellant Through: None.

versus STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

With + CRL.A. 89/2001 SAHENSHER PAL ...Appellant Through: None.

versus STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

With + CRL.A. 91/2001 SUSHIL KUMAR ...Appellant Through: None.

versus Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3

STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

With + CRL.A. 106/2001 RAMESH CHAND ...Appellant Through: None.

versus STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

And + CRL.A. 118/2001 & CRL.M.A. No. 2013/2001 CHOTTEY LAL ...Appellant Through: None.

versus STATE

...Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 16.12.2017 Para 92 of the judgment dated 14th December 2017 in Crl A No. 74 of 2001 and batch shall stand corrected to read as under: "92. Many of the accused have served close to six years of imprisonment and were thereafter released on bail. These are all uniformed policemen who are expected to maintain law and order and not take law into their Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 2 of 3

own hands. They are expected to act responsibly with a view to protecting the life and liberty of the citizens." S. MURALIDHAR, J I.S. MEHTA, J DECEMBER 16, 2017/Rm Crl. Appeal No.74/2001 & connected matters Page 3 of 3