High Court of DelhiMAC.APP./27/2019

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Pinky & ORS

2019-09-20Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri1 pages

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11611/2019 B.H. AHUJA, THROUGH L.R.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ranvir Singh, Advocate.

versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 10.01.2020 C.M. No.53214/2019 Mr. Kirtiman Singh, learned counsel for respondents submits that apprehension of the petitioner is unfounded and the notional pension of the deceased shall be fixed from 01.01.2006 and not from 01.01.2016 as mentioned in the table which is a typographical error. Respondents are bound by the statement made by their counsel. Application is accordingly disposed of.

G.S.SISTANI, J ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 10, 2020/Ne