Lokesh Prabhakar v. Archana Prabhakar

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 52/2024 LOKESH PRABHAKAR ..... Appellant Through:

Appellant in person.

Mr Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

versus ARCHANA PRABHAKAR ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Satya Ranjan, Mr Kautilya Birat and Mr Ankush Kapoor, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 10.05.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] REVIEW PET. 121/2024 1.

Mr Mahesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate has joined the proceedings via video conferencing.

2.

Mr Tiwari says that he seeks discharge from appearing in the present proceedings on behalf of the appellant/review petitioner. 3.

The statement of Mr Tiwari is taken on record. 4.

Accordingly, Mr Tiwari is discharged from his obligation to appear in the matter.

5.

We find no merit in the review petition.

6.

It is, accordingly, dismissed.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 10, 2024/at Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:50:55