← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/2487/2026

No 890120023 Ex Hav Tlr Ramesh Kumar v. Union Of India & ORS.

2026-02-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora2 pages

$~55 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2487/2026 CM APPL. 12077/2026 NO 890120023 EX HAV TLR RAMESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Randhir Singh, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sarvesh P Shrivastava, GP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 23.02.2026 CM APPL. 12076/2026 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2487/2026 CM APPL. 12077/2026 3.

This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "a) to issue an appropriate writ in nature of certiorari to quashing/setting aside the impugned orders dated 30-08-2003 (ANNEXURE P-1) and November 2005 (ANNEXURE P-2) passed by the respondents;

b) to issue a writ in nature of mandamus directing the respondents to restore the increments accrued by the petitioner prior to punishment and pay the arrears of the original pay & allowances, increments for which the petitioner is entitled to along with interest @ 10 p.a; and (c) Issue such further appropriate writ/ order / direction as this Hon 'ble Court may be deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case."

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2026 at 13:24:41

4.

In effect, the petitioner is challenging the orders dated 30.08.2003 and November, 2005 whereby, the petitioner was imposed certain penalty(s) pursuant to a charge-sheet issued to him and the appeal thereof, was rejected vide letter dated 24.11.2025.

5.

On a specific query, Mr. Randhir Singh, counsel on behalf of Mr. Vinod Sherawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that as there was apprehension in the mind of the petitioner, that, if he approach the Court, the respondents may take some prejudicial action against the petitioner, he did not approach the Court.

6.

Concedingly, the petition having been filed in the year 2026 for a cause of action which has arisen in the years 2003 and 2005; that too without any explanation for the delay and latches, we find no reason to entertain the present petition. The same is dismissed. The pending application, if any, is dismissed.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J FEBRUARY 23, 2026 rk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2026 at 13:24:41