High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./70/2014
Suraj Bhan v. State
2016-04-07Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Pratibha Rani1 pages
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 70/2014 SURAJ BHAN ..... Petitioner Through:
None.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R
% 07.04.2016 1.
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2.
Perusal of the record reveals that none had been appearing on behalf of the petitioner for the last two dates of hearing. Even steps for service of respondent No.2 have not been taken.
3.
In the circumstances, the revision petition is dismissed in default as well as for non-prosecution.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
APRIL 07, 2016 'st'