← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1554/2026

Sh Rajiv Narang And ORS v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR

2026-02-25Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee3 pages

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1554/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6301/2026 SH RAJIV NARANG AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates with SI Vikrant, PS:

Amar Colony Mr. Himanshu Pal, Advocate for Respondent no.2 alongwith Respondent no.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 25.02.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.200/2025 dated 25.03.2025 registered at PS.: Amar Colony, Delhi under Sections 406/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Mediation Settlement dated 19.07.2025 arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before the Mediation Centre Saket Courts, New Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities. 2.

The present petition is accompanied by the aforesaid Mediation Settlement dated 19.07.2025 [Annexure P2], and is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners and of respondent no.2, alongwith proofs of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

their respective I.Ds.

3.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and confirms that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 4.

Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and confirms that the learned Judge, Family Courts, Saket Courts, Delhi has allowed the Second Motion in the petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 regarding the decree of divorce by mutual consent of the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 on 31.01.2026. Further, she affirms that prior thereto she has also entered into the aforesaid Mediation Settlement with the petitioners in compliance whereof, the petitioners have already paid her a total sum of Rs.11,00,000/-, and also handed over a further sum of Rs.6,50,000/- vide Demand Draft No.711035 dated 03.02.2026 (Indian Bank, Branch: Sector 93A, Noida) in Court today as a full and final settlement qua all her claims including alimony, maintenance (present, past and future), stridhan etc. Lastly, respondent no.2 states that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 5.

The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer.

6.

Since, a Mediation Settlement has already been arrived at voluntarily between the parties, as also since, accompanying affidavit(s) of the parties involved have also been filed herewith, and since it is agreed that the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions thereof, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 7.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.200/2025 dated 25.03.2025 registered at PS.: Amar Colony, Delhi under Sections 406/498A/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

8.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 25, 2026/So The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.