Ms Moti Mahal Legendary Hospitality Through Its Sole Proprietor & ANR. v. Ms Sant Foods Through Its Proprietor Mr Ravi Gupta & ORS.

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + M/S MOTI MAHAL LEGENDARY HOSPITALITY THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR & ANR.

.....Plaintiffs Through:

Mr. Rishabh Sharma and Ms. Ambica Sood, Advocates.

versus M/S SANT FOODS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR RAVI GUPTA & ORS.

.....Defendants Through:

Ms. Shreya Sethi and Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advocates for D-2 and 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

O R D E R

% 18.03.2026 I.A. 6824/2026 1.

This joint application is filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 1 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording the settlement between them.

2.

By order dated 25.02.2026, this Court had restrained Defendant No. 1 and all other acting on its behalf from advertising, selling, offering for sale, marketing, promoting, operating or carrying on the business of running the restaurant and/or catering business under or by use of the marks 'MOTI MAHAL'

and/or its formative marks and/or any other mark identical/deceptively similar to the MOTI MAHAL mark, amounting to infringement and/or passing off with a further direction to Defendant No. 1 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

to forthwith recall and withdraw from circulation any material bearing the impugned marks, including but not limited to catalogues, menus, stationery, labels, signages, prints, packaging, plates, billboards, pamphlets, invoices etc. as also any sign boards, hoardings or any material from all online platforms, including third party and social media websites within one week from the date of receipt of the notice.

3.

During the pendency of the suit, parties have amicably settled and resolved their disputes and executed the Settlement Agreement dated 13.03.2026, which is appended with the application incorporating the terms of settlement.

4.

Court has perused the terms of the settlement and finds the same to be lawful.

5.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed recording the settlement between the Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 1 in terms of settlement appended with the application. 6.

Application stands disposed of.

CS(COMM) 189/2026 & I.A. 5272/2026 7.

This suit is filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction restraining Defendant No. 1 and all others acting on its behalf from using the registered trademark of the Plaintiffs 'MOTI MAHAL' or any 'MOTI MAHAL' formative marks amounting to infringement and passing off. Reliefs of copyright infringement, unfair trade practice, delivery up, rendition of accounts, damages etc., are also sought. 8.

At the outset, counsel for Plaintiffs submits that this suit be decreed in terms of settlement between Plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 and Plaintiffs do not press any relief against the remaining Defendants. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

In view of the settlement between Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 1, which shall bind them, the suit is decreed. Needless to state, Settlement Agreement dated 13.03.2026 shall form part of the decree. 10.

Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 11.

Suit is disposed of along with the pending application. 12.

Dates of 24.04.2026 before Court and 20.03.2026 before learned Joint Registrar stand cancelled.

13.

Court appreciates the efforts of the parties and counsels for the parties in facilitating settlement and expeditious disposal of the suit. JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 18, 2026 S.Sharma The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.