Dharminder Singh @ Gugni v. Union Of India & ORS.

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 528/2025 DHARMINDER SINGH @ GUGNI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. M. S. Khan, Mr. Rahul Sahani, Mr. Qausar Khan and Mr. Prashant Prakash, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr.

Ayush Tanwar and Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, Advocates for UOI Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State Ms. Shilpa Singh, SPP, NIA with Mr.

Ram Gopal Sharma, Dy. SP, CIO

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 25.03.2025 1.

The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter "BNSS") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

"a) to admit this petition and to issue a writ of Habeas corpus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby quashing the impugned order no. 11011 dated: 23.09.2024 passed by the respondent no. 1 in exercise of the powers conferred under section 303 (1) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha W.P.(CRL) 528/2025 Page 1 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2025 at 14:41:13

Sanhita read with sub-section (3) of section 43(D) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 thereby confining /detaining the petitioner while denying his movement from Tihar/ Mandoli jail and from taking him out of the jurisdiction of National Capital of Delhi.

b) to Pass any other order(s)/ direction(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Appellant." 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that respondent-NIA has already approved the transfer of the petitioner, therefore, nothing has left for further adjudication in the matter. 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-NIA has not disputed the facts as stated by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

In view of the above facts and circumstances, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the instant petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

5.

Accordingly, the instant petition along with pending applications, if any, stands dismissed as not pressed in view of the above submissions advanced on behalf of the parties.

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 25, 2025 gs/anr Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P.(CRL) 528/2025 Page 2 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2025 at 14:41:13