Ravinder Kumar Suri v. Rajinder Sobti

$~11 & 12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM APPL. No. 15995/2019 in CONT.CAS(C) 40/2019 RAVINDER KUMAR SURI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Achin Mittal, Advocate.

versus RAJINDER SOBTI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Gautam Panjwani, Advocate.

+ CM APPL.

Nos.

4492/2017, 15618/2017, 9144/2018, 1265412655/2019, 16359/2019 & 16443/2019 in RC.REV. 48/2017 M/S SOBTI FURNITURE MART PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Gautam Panjwani, Advocate.

versus RAVINDER KUMAR SURI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Achin Mittal, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 26.09.2019 1.

An adjournment slip has been circulated on behalf of petitioner in RC.REV.48/2017.

2.

At request, renotify on 18.02.2020.

3.

In the meantime, petitioner shall ensure that the user charges fixed by order dated 28.02.2017 are paid monthly on or before 10th day of each English Calendar month and arrears, if any, are cleared CONT.CAS(C) 40/2019 & RC.REV.48/2017

within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

Interim order to continue subject to petitioner paying the user charges within time.

5.

It is prayed on behalf of Mr.Vineet Kumar, Advocate, counsel for petitioner in RC.REV.48/2017 that his vakalatnama be discharged since the petitioner has engaged another counsel. 6.

Since the petitioner in RC.REV.48/2017 has engaged Mr.Gautam Panjwani, Advocate, the vakalatnama of Mr.Vineet Kumar, Advocate is discharged.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 rk CONT.CAS(C) 40/2019 & RC.REV.48/2017