Shriom Chauhan v. State

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 115/2019 SHRIOM CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. K. S. Negi with Mr. Arpan Malik, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State.

Mr. Anuj Kumar Garg, Adv. for complainant with complainant in person SI Prateek Sazena, PS Jaitpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 29.08.2019 Vide the present application, the applicant/accused seeks anticipatory bail in pursuance to FIR No.536/2018 registered at Police Station Jaitpur for the offences punishable under sections 420/406 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, has agreed to pay an amount of ₹10 lacs without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the case.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to prepare a FDR for an amount of ₹10 lacs in the name of the Registrar General of this court in the renewal mode that shall be subject to the outcome of the trial. Accordingly, the IO concerned is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner/ applicant be released on bail on the following terms and

conditions:- (i) That the petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of IO;

(ii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation by police officer, as and when required; I hereby make it clear that if prosecution succeeded in the case, the Registrar General of this Court is directed to release the amount with interest accrued thereon in favour of the complainant. In case of default of aforementioned conditions, the State is at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. Application stands allowed and disposed of, accordingly. Order dasti.

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J AUGUST 29, 2019 ms