← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1344/2024

Sh. Akshat Jain & ORS. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2024-03-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri3 pages

$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1344/2024 SH. AKSHAT JAIN & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Kapil Jain, Ms. Mamta Jain and Mr. Cherry Jain, Advocates with petitioners in person.

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Ranjans, P.S. Bindapur.

Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 15.03.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 980/2019 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Binda Pur, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No. 1 (husband) and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are in-laws of the complainant. 3.

Mr. Sabharwal, learned APP for the State submits that in the present case petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.11.2023. In terms of the settlement, the parties have already been granted divorce by mutual consent vide divorce decree dated 01.02.2024 passed by the Family Court, Rohini, Delhi in HMA No. 275/2024. It was agreed that a sum of Rs.32,00,000/-, as full and final settlement, shall be paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2 towards her claims qua maintenance, stridhan, alimony, etc. It is further submitted that out of the settled amount, a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- has already been paid and remaining balance amount of Rs.2,00,000/- is being paid by way of a demand draft, photocopy whereof has been placed on record.

5.

Petitioners, who are present in Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as by I.O./SI Ranjans, P.S. Bindapur. 6.

Respondent No. 2, who is present in Court and has been identified by the I.O., states that she has settled her disputes with petitioner No.1 of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also acknowledges the receipt of entire settled amount and submits that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed against the petitioners, subject to encashment of demand draft of Rs.2 lacs handed over to her today.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to encashment of aforementioned demand draft. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 15, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.