Vijay Kumar Sanan(Sanon) ANR v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) ANR
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1347/2024 VIJAY KUMAR SANAN(SANON) ANR .....Petitioners Through:
Mr Jagdeep Anand, Adv.
versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ANR .....Respondents Through:
Mr Aashneet Singh, APP for State SI Satyender Kumar, PS-Tilak Marg
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 25.11.2024 1.
This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0081/2017 dated 12.04.2017 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at Police StationTilak Marg and proceedings emanating therefrom. 2.
As per the FIR, the petitioners had forged and fabricated an Agreement to Sell with respect to a shop belonging to the complainant/respondent no. 2. The petitioners also had filed a suit for specific performance with regard to the specific performance of the said Agreement to Sell.
3.
The petitioner No.1 is present in Court and petitioner No.2 has joined the proceedings through VC and have been identified by their counsel Mr Jagdeep Anand.
4.
The respondent No.2 is also present in Court and has been identified by the Investigating Officer SI Satyender Kumar, PS-Tilak Marg. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/11/2024 at 12:49:25
5.
During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement dated 18.12.2023 wherein the parties have resolved their disputes and the complainant has agreed that he will cooperate in quashing of the FIR. The respondent No.2 states that he does not wish to prosecute the FIR any further and wants to put a quietus to the entire matter. 6.
Both the parties state that they have entered into the aforesaid settlement out of their own free will, volition and without any threat, force, undue influence or coercion. It is stated by respondent No.2 that he has no objection if the FIR is quashed.
7.
Since the parties have arrived at a settlement and no disputes are pending, I am convinced that quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of justice. The Court does not see any fruitful purpose if criminal proceedings are permitted to be prosecuted any further. It is a fit case for quashing. In this view of the matter, there is no reason to continue the proceedings. 8.
In this view of the matter, FIR No. 0081/2017 dated 12.04.2017 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at Police Station-Tilak Marg and proceedings pursuant thereto, if any, are hereby quashed. 9.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 25, 2024 sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/11/2024 at 12:49:25