Rishi Raj v. Anita Malik

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 196/2026, CM APPL. 13359/2026 (stay) RISHI RAJ .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Harish Malhotra Sr. Adv and Mr.

Hemant Kakkar, Advocate.

versus ANITA MALIK .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sandeep Vishnu with Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Monika Verma with Respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 17.04.2026 CM APPL. 24895/2026 1.

Application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC') has been filed on behalf of the both the parties wherein it is submitted that the matter stands mutually settled. The Appellant has undertaken to vacate the premises on or before 30.06.2027 and has agreed to pay the user occupation charges @Rs.90,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.04.2026 till 30.06.2027. 2.

Both the parties are present, who endorsed the terms of the Settlement.

3.

Both the parties state that they have entered into the Compromise voluntarily without any fear and coercion and shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement.

4.

In view of the Settlement between the parties, the Appeal is The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 11:58:53

accordingly disposed of. The pending Application also stands disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J APRIL 17, 2026/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 11:58:53