Shesh Bahadur Pandey v. State

$~60.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 266/2017 SHESH BAHADUR PANDEY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Puneet Bharti, PS Sarai Rohilla

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 27.01.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition has become infructuous since the State itself has granted parole, which has not been availed of by the petitioner.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 27, 2017 sr