Surender Prasad Singh v. State

$~47.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 186/2017 SURENDER PRASAD SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhan Mohan, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashish Negi & Ms. Seema Patnaha, Advocates for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC along with Inspector Uma Bhardwaj, PS-Delhi Cantt, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 20.01.2017 The petitioner seeks parole to repair his house and to re-establish social ties. However, the nominal roll on record shows that the petitioner was granted furlough between 11.11.2016 and 03.12.2016. The petitioner has premised this petition on the rejection of his parole vide order dated 09.11.2016. As noticed, thereafter he has been released on furlough which expired as late as on 03.12.2016.

In these circumstances, the petitioner should apply for parole to the State before approaching this Court.

Dismissed.

VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 20, 2017 B.S. Rohella