Imran v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~6 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 172/2019 IMRAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv.

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Rajpal, P.S. Khyala.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 21.02.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter. He is in custody for the last three months. Investigations are complete and charge-sheet has been filed. Therefore, it is prayed that petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned APP has opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. It is contended that prosecutrix is minor aged about 13 years. In her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., prosecutrix has categorically stated that petitioner forcibly took her in his room and took off her clothes and when she resisted petitioner threatened that he would kill her parents and brother. Thereafter, petitioner raped the prosecutrix.

Keeping in mind the serious allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner on bail at this stage. Bail application is dismissed.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 21, 2019 ga