← Library
High Court of DelhiLPA/10/2020

Rajesh Katyal v. Union Of India & ORS

2020-01-10Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Asha Menon2 pages

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 10/2020 RAJESH KATYAL ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. A K Singhla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Amrita Prakash (CGSC), UOI with Mr. Kushal Agarwal, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Manish K Srivastava & Mr. Riju Tanjea, Advocates for R-2/TPDDL Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel for NDMC/R-3 Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Komal, Advocate Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Modi, Ms. Pallavi Saigal & Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocates for R-5

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON

O R D E R

% 10.01.2020 CAV 19/2020 Since Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.5/Caveator, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. Appln. 822/2020 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

LPA 10/2020

LPA 10/2020 1.

The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 10.12.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by him challenging grant of an electricity connection to his landlord/respondent No.5 at Hans Cinema, G. T. Karnal Road, Azadpur, Delhi, in the category of charging of e-vehicle.

2.

After addressing arguments for some time, Mr. A. K. Singhla, Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant/petitioner submits that his briefing counsel may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal while reserving the right of the appellant/petitioner to seek appropriate legal recourse against the respondent No.5, as may be available in law.

3.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as not pressed. HIMA KOHLI, J ASHA MENON, J JANUARY 10, 2020 sm/pkb LPA 10/2020