← Library
High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/64/2019

Kishan Chand v. Rajeev Rai Bhatnagar

2019-03-06Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula1 pages

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 64/2019 KISHAN CHAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sahib Singh Mehandru, Advocate versus RAJEEV RAI BHATNAGAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr.panel counsel with Mr. Vivek Kumar, Law Officer, CRPF

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 06.03.2019

1. Counsel for the Petitioner states that the interim directions have been substantially complied with by the Respondent and the Petitioner is satisfied with it. As a result, the Petitioner does not wish to continue the present contempt petition.

2. The contempt petition is disposed of. It is made clear that the interim order will continue to be complied with.

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

SANJEEV NARULA, J.

MARCH 06, 2019 mw