← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1772/2026

Kajal v. State Of NCT Of Delh & ANR.

2026-03-13Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1772/2026 KAJAL .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Aparna Bhadoria, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELH & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Mr. Hitesh Vali, Advocate, SI Sachin, P.S. Defence Colony and SI Sonam, Main I.O.

Mr. Aadarsh Kothari, Mr. Utpal Sharma, Ms. Aparna Bhadoria and Mr. M. P. Sharma, Advocates for complainant Mr. Bharat Monga, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 13.03.2026 1.

By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR bearing No. 62/2023, registered at Police Station Defence Colony, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC') and subsequent proceedings arising out of the said FIR.

2.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned from Police Station Defence Colony, Delhi. 4.

Brief facts of the present case are the while respondent no. 2 alongwith a neighbour was trying to enter her house, she was obstructed, abused and was pushed by the petitioner, pursuant to the incident, the present FIR was registered against the petitioner. Chargesheet in the case already stands filed.

5.

It is stated that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have now amicably settled their disputes vide Settlement Agreement dated 21.02.2026.

6.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO concerned, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 7.

In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 8.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 62/2023, registered at Police Station Defence Colony, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/341/34 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

9.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 13, 2026/ns/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.