Vindesar Ray And ANR v. State And ANR.
$~54 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ VINDESAR RAY AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amit Singh Tanwar & Mr. Deepak Goel, Advs.
Petitioners in person versus STATE AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State SI Naresh Kumar Sharma, PS- Krishna Nagar R2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 23.02.2024 CRL.M.A. 5974/2024 (for exemption) 1.
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.
The application stands disposed of.
3.
The present petition is filed for quashing of FIR 580/2023 dated 02.09.2023 registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar for offences under Sections 288/337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 4.
It is alleged in the FIR that Respondent No. 2 was employed under the petitioners and on 02.09.2023, a pillar had fallen on Respondent No. 2 and he got injured. Subsequently, he was taken to the hospital by the petitioners. 5.
The present petition has been filed on the ground that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
parties have amicably settled all their disputes by way of settlement agreement dated 05.02.2024. In terms of the settlement agreement, out of the total settlement amount of ₹5,50,000/-, a sum of ₹50,000/- already stands paid to Respondent No.2 and the balance settlement amount of ₹5,00,000/- is paid today in Court by way of Demand Drafts in the following manner:
S. No.
DD No.
Date Bank Amount (₹) 1.
000944 10.01.2024 Equitas Small Finance Bank 2,00,000/- 2.
000945 10.01.2024 Equitas Small Finance Bank 2,00,000/- 3.
000953 02.02.2024 Equitas Small Finance Bank 50,000/- 4.
000954 02.02.2024 Equitas Small Finance Bank 50,000/- 6.
It is submitted that the petitioners, even after the mishap, have kept Respondent No. 2 under their employment. All the expenses in relation to the treatment of Respondent No. 2 were borne by the petitioners.
7.
The parties are present in person and have been duly identified by the IO. The complainant / Respondent No. 2, on being asked, states that he is satisfied with the compensation and does not wish to pursue any proceedings arising out of the FIR. 8.
Learned ASC for the State, on instructions from the IO, states that they do not have any objection if the proceedings are quashed.
9.
Offence under Section 337 of the IPC is compoundable whereas offence under Section 288 of the IPC is noncompoundable. 10.
It is well settled that the High Court in exercising its powers under Section 482 CrPC can compound offences which are non-compoundable under the Code on the ground that there is The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
a compromise between the accused and the complainant, however, the Supreme Court had laid down parameters and guidelines for High Court while accepting settlement and quashing the proceedings. In Narinder Singh & Ors. V. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, the Supreme Court has observed as under: - "29. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we sum up and lay down the following principles by which the High Court would be guided in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties and exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting the settlement and quashing the proceedings or refusing to accept the settlement with direction to continue with the criminal proceedings:
29.1. Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselves. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with caution. 29.2. When the parties have reached the settlement and on that basis petition for quashing the criminal proceedings is filed, the guiding factor in such cases would be to secure: (i) ends of justice, or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any court. While exercising the power the High Court is to form an opinion on either of the aforesaid two objectives. 29.3.
Such a power is not to be exercised in those prosecutions which involve heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. Such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society. Similarly, for the offences alleged to have been committed under special statute like the Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity are not to be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between the victim and the offender. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
29.4. On the other hand, those criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominantly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes should be quashed when the parties have resolved their entire disputes among themselves.
29.5. While exercising its powers, the High Court is to examine as to whether the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and continuation of criminal cases would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal cases."
11.
Similarly, in Parbatbhai Aahir & Ors v. State of Gujarat & Anr. reported as (2017) 9 SCC 641, the Supreme Court has observed as under:- "16. The broad principles which emerge from the precedents on the subject, may be summarised in the following propositions:
16.1. Section 482 preserves the inherent powers of the High Court to prevent an abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice. The provision does not confer new powers. It only recognises and preserves powers which inhere in the High Court.
16.2. The invocation of the jurisdiction of the High Court to quash a first information report or a criminal proceeding on the ground that a settlement has been arrived at between the offender and the victim is not the same as the invocation of jurisdiction for the purpose of compounding an offence. While compounding an offence, the power of the court is governed by the provisions of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The power to quash under Section 482 is attracted even if the offence is noncompoundable. 16.3. In forming an opinion whether a criminal proceeding or complaint should be quashed in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482, the High Court must evaluate whether the ends of justice would justify the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
exercise of the inherent power.
16.4. While the inherent power of the High Court has a wide ambit and plenitude it has to be exercised (i) to secure the ends of justice, or (ii) to prevent an abuse of the process of any court.
16.5. The decision as to whether a complaint or first information report should be quashed on the ground that the offender and victim have settled the dispute, revolves ultimately on the facts and circumstances of each case and no exhaustive elaboration of principles can be formulated. 16.6. In the exercise of the power under Section 482 and while dealing with a plea that the dispute has been settled, the High Court must have due regard to the nature and gravity of the offence. Heinous and serious offences involving mental depravity or offences such as murder, rape and dacoity cannot appropriately be quashed though the victim or the family of the victim have settled the dispute. Such offences are, truly speaking, not private in nature but have a serious impact upon society. The decision to continue with the trial in such cases is founded on the overriding element of public interest in punishing persons for serious offences.
16.7. As distinguished from serious offences, there may be criminal cases which have an overwhelming or predominant element of a civil dispute. They stand on a distinct footing insofar as the exercise of the inherent power to quash is concerned.
16.8. Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations fall for quashing where parties have settled the dispute.
16.9. In such a case, the High Court may quash the criminal proceeding if in view of the compromise between the disputants, the possibility of a conviction is remote and the continuation of a criminal proceeding would cause oppression and prejudice; and 16.10. There is yet an exception to the principle set out in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
propositions 16.8. and 16.9. above. Economic offences involving the financial and economic well-being of the State have implications which lie beyond the domain of a mere dispute between private disputants. The High Court would be justified in declining to quash where the offender is involved in an activity akin to a financial or economic fraud or misdemeanour. The consequences of the act complained of upon the financial or economic system will weigh in the balance."
12.
Keeping in view the nature of allegations and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court feels that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the dispute alive. I am of the considered opinion that this is a fit case to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC. 13.
In view of the aforesaid, FIR No. 580/2023 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are, therefore, quashed.
14.
The present petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. AMIT MAHAJAN, J FEBRUARY 23, 2024 "SS"
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.