Honey Yadav v. The State

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 830/2023 HONEY YADAV ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ompal Singh and Mr. Geet Kumar, Advs.

versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with Insp. Ashok Kumar, PS Special Branch and Insp. Prashant Yadav, PS. DIU/Rohini.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN % 06.03.2024

O R D E R

1.

The learned APP for the State submits that the charge has been framed and the matter is now listed for recording of the prosecution evidence.

2.

He further submits that there are three eye witnesses in the matter namely Chintesh @ Chinu, Rahul and Manpreet Rana. 3.

He urges the Court that the bail application of the petitioner may be considered after the statement of the eye witnesses have been recorded for which purpose the date fixed before the learned Trial Court is 15.05.2024. 4.

In view of the above, the I.O is directed to ensure the presence of the three eye witnesses on the next date before the learned Trial Court. 5.

The learned Trial Court is also requested to record the statements of the eye witnesses on the said date or soon thereafter. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:35:34

6.

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one at a later stage after the recording of evidence of the aforesaid witnesses. 7.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J MARCH 6, 2024/dss The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:35:34