High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/263/2019

Rajbir v. State

2019-03-27Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal1 pages

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 263/2019 & Crl.M.A. No.6511/2019 RAJBIR ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Jhanvi Dubey, Advocate for Mr.Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Avi Singh, ASC with Mr.Tanuj, Advocate for State with SI Kamlesh Kumar, PS Kalkaji.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 27.03.2019 It is submitted by counsel for the State/respondent that vide order dated 03.12.2018, the application of parole made by the petitioner was declined as period of six months had not lapsed from the date of termination of the previous parole which was granted to him from 21.08.2018 to 20.09.2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention to the amendment order No.F-18/91/2009/HG-Pt-I/1661-1673. Heard.

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to file fresh application for seeking parole before the concerned authority. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J MARCH 27, 2019/afa