Ghanshyam Giri Girls College Of Education v. National Council For Teacher Education And ANR.

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 559/2020 GHANSHYAM GIRI GIRLS COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Mayank Manish with Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates.

versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing counsel with Ms. Niharika Rai, Advocates for respondents.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 22.01.2020 1.

The substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows:- " a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Directions for processing the application bearing Application ID FR-NRC-202107301479 of the Petitioner institution seeking recognition for the ITEP course; and/or b. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction for NCTE reaccept the processing fee or any other details as desired; "

W.P.(C) 559/2020

2.

It is the petitioner's case that the requisite fee has been deposited.

2.1 For this purpose, my attention has been drawn to pages 113 & 114 of the paper book.

3.

Ms. Dwivedi, who, appears on behalf of the respondents says that she has instructions to convey that if the fee as claimed by the petitioner has been received, the application of the petitioner for recognition of ITEP course shall be processed. 3.1 The statement of the counsel is taken on record. 4.

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of Ms. Dwivedi.

5.

Needless to add, the application will be processed subject to the verification of the assertions made therein and the contents of documents appended thereto.

6.

It is made clear that if any deficiency is found, the same will be pointed out to the petitioner and the petitioner will cure the same within the timeframe defined by the respondents. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JANUARY 22, 2020 c W.P.(C) 559/2020