Deepak Miglani v. Government Of NCT Of Delhi
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 662/2024, CRL.M.A. 5836/2024, CRL.M.A. 37236/2024, CRL.M.A. 17809/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21262/2025 MOHIT SINGH RAGHAV .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Mohit Parkash, PS Sec. II/EOW.
+ BAIL APPLN. 677/2024, CRL.M.A. 6063/2024, CRL.M.A. 34841/2024, CRL.M.A. 17114/2025 & CRL.M.A. 2873/2025 DEEPAK MIGLANI .....Petitioner Through:
None.
versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Mohit Parkash, PS Sec. II/EOW.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R
% 24.07.2025 1.
Despite last opportunity granted on 05.05.2025 to address arguments, none has appeared for the accused/applicants. 2.
Matters are passed over in the interest of justice. JULY 24, 2025/DR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Present:
None for Petitioners.
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Mohit Parkash, PS Sec. II/EOW.
3.
Even in second call, none appears for the accused/applicants. Matters are again passed over.
JULY 24, 2025/ry
Present:
Mr. Pradeep Jain and Mr. Sambhav Jain, Advocates for Petitioner.
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Mohit Parkash, PS Sec. II/EOW.
4.
This is the third call.
5.
Now learned counsel for the accused/applicants has appeared with the request for permission to withdraw these anticipatory bail applications with liberty to file fresh applications before the Trial Court after paying back the dues of all 198 home buyers. It is submitted by learned counsel for the accused/applicants that during pendency of these applications before different predecessor benches, the accused/applicants voluntarily continued to deposit different amounts of money with the Registry of this Court towards settlement of claims of the home buyers in order to establish bona fide of the accused/applicants. Admittedly, the legal position is that the criminal courts, including those dealing with bail matters are not the forum for recovery of money. This Court, therefore, had made it clear that these matters shall be heard on merits.
6.
In the above situation learned counsel for the accused/applicants The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
submits that he shall move a separate application regarding the manner in which the money deposited with the Registry of this Court be dealt with and as regards the remaining claimants, the accused/applicants shall settle separately.
7.
Under the above circumstances, learned counsel for the accused/applicants seeks permission to withdraw these applications with liberty to file afresh before the Court of Sessions in view of change of circumstances in the form of initiation of settlement of claims. 8.
Accordingly, both these applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. Pending applications also stand disposed of. JULY 24, 2025/DR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.