← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/264/2016

Anil Bhatia & ANR v. Punjab National Bank

2016-01-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta2 pages

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 264/2016 ANIL BHATIA & ANR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Hament Choudhary, Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Dr.Sunil Kumar, Advs.

versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ..... Respondent Represented by:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 13.01.2016 CM 1055/2016 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 264/2016 & CM 1054/2016 (stay) 1.

Learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that what was an unintentional error concerning the order dated August 25, 2015, copy whereof was filed before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, has been treated as a deliberate act by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and therefrom a motive has been imputed to the writ petitioner. So stating, counsel also concedes that in the writ petition this aspect of the matter has not been dealt with. That apart, counsel concedes that if this was so, the correct thing for the writ petitioners to do is to have moved an application before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal brining forth such facts which W.P.(C) 264/2016

writ petitioners would rely upon to bring home the point that incomplete order dated August 25, 2015 filed before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal was a mistake and not a deliberate act. 2.

Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with right reserved to move an appropriate application before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.

3.

Dismissing the writ petition and miscellaneous application as withdrawn, we simply observe that if the writ petitioners were to file an application before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal concerning the incomplete order dated August 25, 2015 which was filed before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, the same shall be decided as per law. 4.

Learned counsel for the writ petitioners informs that the respondent Bank would be taking possession of the mortgaged property today. 5.

Copy of this order be supplied dasti to learned counsel for the writ petitioners. It is hoped and expected that the officers of the Punjab National Bank would take into account the order passed today while taking further actions.

6.

No cost.

7.

Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JANUARY 13, 2016 'ga'

W.P.(C) 264/2016