← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1875/2026

Sandeep Singh Aalish Sunny & ANR. v. State Govt. N.C.T Of Delhi & ANR.

2026-03-13Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1875/2026 SANDEEP SINGH AALISH SUNNY & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Alamine and Mr. Sujeet Chaubey, Advocates alongwith petitioners in person versus STATE GOVT. N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Ashok Singh Chauhan, P.S. Nihal Vihar R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 13.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 7694-95/2026 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Applications stand disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 1875/2026 3.

By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 766/2022, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/377/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟).

4.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

5.

The petitioners and respondent no. 2 (appeared through video conferencing) are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi.

6.

Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 11.05.2009 at Gurudwara, Sri Guru Singh Sabha, Amritsar, Punjab, in accordance with Anand Karaj ceremonies under the Anand Marriage Act, 1909 and was duly registered under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is stated that two children were born out of the said wedlock. After some time, due to some matrimonial discord, on the complaint of respondent no.2, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners under the relevant sections. 7.

It is stated that during pendency of investigation, with the intervention of family members and elders, both the parties have settled their disputes vide Settlement Deed and Deed of Compromise dated 02.02.2026. It is further stated that the parties are presently living together since 28.09.2025. 8.

On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been identified by the concerned IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no. 2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Respondent no. 2 further states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 9.

In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 10.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 766/2022, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/377/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.

In view of the above, the present petition alongwith pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

12.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 13, 2026/ns The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.