Guru Prasad v. Delhi Development Authority & ANR.

$~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3217/2026 & CM APPL. 15474/2026 GURU PRASAD .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Rajeshwari, Adv.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC with Ms.

Antara Mishra, Mr. Aryma Sharma, Advs. for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 13.03.2026 1.

This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:

"a. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to permit, process, and complete the execution and registration of the Conveyance Deed/Authorisation Slip in respect of property bearing No. C-121/1, Lakhi Ram Park, Kirari Suleman Nagar, North-West Delhi - 110086 admeasuring 233.33 sq. yards/195 sq. meters in favour of the Petitioner under the PM-UDAY Scheme; b. Direct the Respondents to accept the existing documents already recognised at the time of issuance of the Authorisation Slip and to facilitate registration before the concerned Sub-Registrar within a timebound period to be fixed by this The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 13:37:35

Hon'ble Court;

c. Declare that the right of the Petitioner to obtain registered title pursuant to the Authorisation Slip already issued cannot be defeated by subsequent procedural requirements or administrative delay;

d. Award costs of the present petition in favour of the Petitioner; and..."

2.

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled to plot under the PM-Uday Scheme and has already been declared entitled. Additionally, the Scheduled Caste Commission has recommended the case of the petitioner.

3.

Ms. Rajeshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the petition is treated as a representation and decided by the respondent No. 1 in accordance with their extant rules.

4.

With consent of parties, it is directed that the present petition will be treated as a representation by the respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 1 will accord a personal hearing to the petitioner / his representative. 5.

After hearing the petitioner, the respondent No. 1 shall pass a speaking order expeditiously and not later than 3 months from today. 6.

The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 13, 2026/sp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 13:37:35