Sh. Nigam Chaudhary v. State & ANR.

$~25 & 26 (common order) *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 547/2019 and Crl.M.A.2300-2301/2019 SH. NIGAM CHAUDHARY Petitioner Through:

Mr. Hem C Vashisht, Advocate versus STATE & ANR.

Through:

Respondents Mr. K.S. Ahuja, AFP for the State with SI Anil Kumar, PS Neb Sarai + CRL.M.C. 551/2019 and Crl.M.A.2307-2308/2019 SH. KARAM VIR & ANR Petitioners Through:

Ms. Vishakha Basist, Advocate versus STATE & ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Anil Kumar, PS Neb Sarai

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

ORDER

% 01.02.2019 After some hearing, upon their attention being drawn to the rulings of the Supreme Court reported as Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another, (2017) 9 see 641; the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submit that they may be permitted to withdraw the captioned petitions and the applications filed therewith.

The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.

FEBRUARY 01,2019/vk R BA, J.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.