Balram v. State

$~58 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 156/2018 BALRAM ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC with Mr.Prem Sagar, Advocate with SI Manju Chahar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 17.01.2018 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record.

2.

Nominal Roll dated 06.01.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376(2)(G)/376/366/506/109 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 30,000/-. Crl.A.190/2014 was dismissed by this Court on 27.10.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone five years and twenty-four days incarceration besides remission for eleven months and twenty-eight days as on 02.01.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous

convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. Earlier he was granted interim bail and there are no allegations of its misuse. 3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J.

JANUARY 17, 2018 / tr