Jeet Dahiya v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 667/2024 JEET DAHIYA ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with SI Dipender Singh, P.S. S.B. Dairy, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 27.02.2024 CRL.M.A. 6229/2024 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 667/2024 3.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.') has been filed by the petitioner seeking issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the petitioner on parole for a period of one month in case arising out of FIR bearing No.862/2016 registered at Police Station, S.B. Dairy, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. ('IPC') 4.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:17:39

petitioner has filed the present petition for grant of parole on the ground that he has to get his daughter admitted in a school. It is stated that the admission process will begin from 01.03.2024 and would be over by 31.03.2024 and the concerned authority may take considerable time to decide the application for parole, therefore, the petitioner has applied for parole directly without approaching the concerned authority by way of the present petition. It is further submitted that if the petitioner is not released on parole his daughter will face loss of an academic year as she will have to wait for another year for admission in the school. In these circumstances, the petitioner be granted parole as prayed for.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the concerned authority is directed to decide the application for grant of parole to the petitioner within 10 days from the receipt of this order.

6. In case, the present representation is not decided by the concerned authority within 10 days the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court.

7. This order be communicated to the Superintendent Jail today itself by the Registry.

8.

The application is disposed of in above terms. 9.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2024/hs Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:17:39