Sulekh Malik v. State Ofnct Of Delhi & ANR.
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1917/2023 SULEKH MALIK .....Petitioner Through:
Mr.
Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate.
versus STATE OFNCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State.
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R
% 15.10.2024 Mr. Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2, on instructions, submitted at bar that the direction no. "a" passed by the learned ASJ in impugned order dated 22nd February, 2023 has already been complied with within time and Rs. 75 Lakhs, in the form of FDR, has been deposited with the Court concerned. Mr. Manish Vashist, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2, he does not wish to press the instant petition at this stage.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 at bar, on instructions, this The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:37:11
Court has no occasion to disbelieve the said statement. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has fairly conceded to the statement given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 by stating that he does not wish to press the instant petition on merits at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J OCTOBER 15, 2024 rk/ryp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:37:11