Prity Arora v. The Directorate Of Education & ORS.

$~62 to 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (62) + W.P.(C) 3469/2023, CM APPL. 13457/2023 & CM APPL. 44344/2023 VANDANA YADAV .....Petitioner Through:

None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms.

Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE.

Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr.

Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4.

(63) + W.P.(C) 3472/2023, CM APPL. 13471/2023 & CM APPL. 43271/2023 PRITY ARORA .....Petitioner Through:

None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms.

Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE.

Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr.

Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4.

(64) + W.P.(C) 3473/2023, CM APPL. 13476/2023 & CM APPL. 44623/2023 POONAM .....Petitioner Through:

None The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms.

Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE.

Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr.

Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4.

(65) + W.P.(C) 3474/2023, CM APPL. 13478/2023 & CM APPL. 43212/2023 SARIKA DABAS .....Petitioner Through:

None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr.

Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

O R D E R

% 12.12.2025 1.

This writ petition is filed seeking direction to change the inquiry officer.

2.

On 02.12.2025, the petitioner remained unrepresented inspite of two passovers. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the inquiry proceedings were concluded during the pendency of the petition and the services of the petitioner have been terminated. 3.

The petitioner remained unrepresented on previous dates. 4.

Today the Court is apprised that the termination order has been challenged by filing an appeal.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

5.

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 6.

Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the petition in case the cause of action still survives.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J DECEMBER 12, 2025/'JK'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.