← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.A./465/2004

Aruna & Arun v. State

2017-07-26Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak1 pages

$~41 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 465/2004 ARUNA & ARUN ..... Appellant Through:

None.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 26.07.2017 NBWs issued against the appellant have been received back unserved. It is reported that she is not living at the address given in the appeal. It is further reported that her present whereabouts are not known. Surety has also remained unserved. He was also not found residing at the address given in the surety bond. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Reliance is placed on Mukesh vs. State MANU/DE/1056/2008. Appellant be taken into custody to serve the remaining sentence. A.K. PATHAK, J.

JULY 26, 2017 ga