Sunil Kumar v. The Director General- S.S.B & ORS.

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3983/2022 SUNIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Niraj Jha, Adv.

versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL- S.S.B & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Ms.

Usha Jamnal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 04.09.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

CM APPL. 55920/2025 (for modification) 1.

This application seeks correction of certain typographical errors in the judgment dated 12 August 2025, whereby we have disposed of WP(C) 3983/2022.

2.

It is pointed out that the reference to the matrimonial dispute between the parties, as shown in paragraphs 6, 12 and 14 of the judgment should read as HMA 747/2013 instead of HMA 767/2013. 3.

Mr. Farman Ali, learned SPC for the respondents has acknowledged this fact.

Signed By:PREETI 10:03:46 WP(C) 3983/2022

4.

Accordingly, the paragraphs 6, 12 and 14 of the judgment would read thus:

"6.

The petitioner married one Sunita Devi on 23 November 2007. The matrimonial relationship between them soured. The petitioner filed Misc (Civil) HMA No.747/2013 under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 19551 for divorce, before the Family Court, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

***** 12.

Following this, as a result, the divorce petition Misc (Civil) HMA No.747/2013 was resuscitated. By judgment dated 7 March 2018, the learned Family Court dismissed the divorce petition of the petitioner against Sunita Devi.

***** 14.

The judgment and decree dated 24 June 2017 of the learned Family Court, dismissing Misc (Civil) HMA No.747/2013 was challenged by the petitioner before the High Court of Rajasthan by way of CMA 2343/2018."

5.

This order shall be treated as a corrigendum to the judgment dated 12 August 2025.

6.

The application is allowed accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 4, 2025/ng 1 "HMA", hereinafter Signed By:PREETI 10:03:46 WP(C) 3983/2022