Arif v. State

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 400/2019 ARIF ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms.

Jyoti Babbar, Adv. with SI Ashish, P.S.

Bhajanpura.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 07.02.2019 The petitioner seeks parole to re-establish his social ties with his family and society and to take care of his child as well as his aged parents. According to the Status Report, submitted by the learned counsel for the State, his address in Delhi has been verified. He is undergoing a sentence of five years of which he has already undergone two years three months and 23 days. He has earned a remission period of five months and 20 days. Unexpired portion of his sentence is two years two months and 17 days. His conduct in jail is stated to be satisfactory. Earlier he has been granted parole for four weeks w.e.f. 14.03.2018 and he has not misused the said liberty. In view of the above, the petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction

of the Jail Superintendent concerned subject to the following conditions:- (1) The petitioner shall report to the concerned SHO once a week on during the period of parole.

(2) He shall furnish his telephone number to the SHO concerned, which the petitioner shall keep operational at all times (3) She shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi. (4) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

With the above directions the writ petition is disposed off. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master and a copy be also communicated to the Jail Superintendent through the IO concerned. NAJMI WAZIRI, J FEBRUARY 07, 2019/acm