Joginder v. The State (NCT Of Delhi )

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 236/2020 and CRL.M.A. 1750/2020 (exemption) JOGINDER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Ajay Kumar, P.S.:

Rajouri Garden

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 05.02.2020 Petitioner is seeking furlough for a period of two months on the ground of examination of his daughter namely Harshita Vaid of Xth Class and to re-establish social ties with his family. Status report filed.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.

The present petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. BRIJESH SETHI, J FEBRUARY 05, 2020 savita