Age Patel Joint Venture v. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 445/2026 & I.A. 6950/2026 AGE PATEL JOINT VENTURE .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sameer Jain, Ms. Aastha Sharma, Mr. Manu Kumar & Mr. Rajendra Mahajan, Advs.

versus KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Mr. Jatin Dhamija, Mr.

Vinayak, Ms.

Aishwarya Nigam, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

O R D E R

% 21.05.2026 1.

Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the respondent has nominated its arbitrator.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already nominated its arbitrator. Now, both the arbitrators have to unanimously appoint the third arbitrator.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing this petition in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent. 4.

The petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending application stands disposed of.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 21, 2026 Ch The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/05/2026 at 11:14:15